Awaiting reviewer selection for long time However, the duration of an individual submission may vary drastically because there are many stochastic factors involved in the review process. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Should I send a mail to query the process of my manuscript since it is in the "Awaiting EIC I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. This means that the manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review has likely been completed, and now the journal is awaiting the final scores from the reviewer/s. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. 査読者の選出待ち. . Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". They could have two, and a bunch of unanswered invites. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Jul 31, 2021 · However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Once you I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. The efficiency of the editorial department is too slow. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Also, I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Is there something that would be holding it up? Update: 4/21: Suppressor delivered & assigned to me 4/21: SS awaiting review 4/29: ready to sign 4/30: ready to certify Assessment. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. But this time can vary – it is a bit of a judgement call, depending on the timeframe that is stipulated and the amount of time that has passed. 11. I have written to (name) on (date) and (date), but have not heard back from him/her. View. 21 awaiting reviewer scores 2021. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. Download . On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? The statuses on submission portals change based on the journal's processes in real-time. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. " This is where you can rate the review, and it will become part of the reviewer's score. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". and is weavable, enabling the monitoring of various tissues and integration into breathable textiles for real-time cardiovascular monitoring. fast response speed, and long lifespan, and can be used in So, we have made some edits/assumptions. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. If that is indeed the case and the journal policy allows, you may suggest some peer reviewers (if you know any). 论文小修后await. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. It has been more than a month since then but the status has remained "Assigned to AE. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Does it mean the work will be rejected? MPY 2023-06-20 2023-04-12 Submission 2023-04-17 Under review 2023-05-05 Major revisions based on reviewers' comments, four reviewers Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I It means nothing. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Is it a bad sign? manuscript at any time on the online peer review system. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. This change has occurred The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but finally everything is settled before graduation! D华丽 2023-04-17 2023/02/18 Submission 2023/05/18 Major Revision Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Edited to fix stupid mobile formatting April 28th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment May 11th: Under review May 14th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment June 4th: Awaiting Reviewer Scores July 4th: Awaiting AE Recommendation July 12th: Awaiting EIC Decision July 21st: Accepted Overall, the waiting time for the first review was very long, approximately 11 months, with a few reminders in between. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. 投了篇文章，是scholane的投稿，投出去已经2周，一开始是awaiting reviewer selection，就是awaiting reviewer assignment和awaiting reviewer invitation不断切换，已经相互转换5次了。请问这是找不到审稿人的节奏么。 TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Click on “Take Action. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. It has been quite a long time. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. I would call admissions and remind them of how interested you are in the program and that you were wondering how long the wait time is. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Any Hi. When you review papers for such system, you are explicitly asked again if you would like (again) to be the reviewer for the second (nth) time. 3 The publishing time is too long, starting from 3 months. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 23 Status 5: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Awaiting reviewer selection. Your paper is evaluated by expert peers in the field, known as referees, with 2021. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. 28 awaiting ae recommendation 2021. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. How long I should wait for the final verdict? 投了一个半月了，状态一直在awaiting reviewer selection 和 awaiting reviewer assignment之间变化，来回首页论文范文毕业论文论文发表论文格式期刊论文大全期刊问答问答百科期刊大全最新期刊论文问答杂志问答 A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. The most common form of peer review for our journals and case studies is 'double anonymous', which keeps the process as objective as possible. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Receiving the first decision My question is: how long does SS take to review my form 4? It’s been about a week and I was under the impression it would be quicker than that. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. But all of a sudden Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. 2022 In peer review process 23. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. e. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. If there is no update by then, you may consider writing to the editor about it. I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). Please note that For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 05. Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. Keep in mind that the main reason why peer reviews take so long is not the time required by the review itself but that the referee has to find time amongst their other duties (see also this question I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. But all of a sudden, instead What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status Maybe the editor found a reviewer before changing the manuscript's status, so it passed through the "awaiting reviewer assignment" stage in a single step. 06. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. This change has Oct 14, 2022 · 首先，在作者最初看到系统显示 awaiting reviewer selection 以后，没过几天，还没等作者联系出版社，系统状态变成了awaiting reviewers assignment 。不用说，换审稿人继续 May 25, 2016 · 这个Awaiting Reviewer Selection 和 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 状态到底什么区别啊？怎么来回变动两次？这个期刊的投稿指南上说6-8个星期就能一审结束。。可是现在 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Still the status is same. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Not necessarily. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Mar 22, 2021 · Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". These status should not be taken seriously. Today it went back to "awaiting After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. The AE is not solely employed by IEEE, but also has a faculty position (usually) and other obligations. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The system is telling you that the invitation has been sent to the original (and perhaps new) reviewers and they are waiting for them to confirm. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. I didnt see the "under review How long should I wait for a response from the journal? you could wait for some time to know the decision. Is this normal or should I be worried? The ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) welcomes papers on a full range of research in the knowledge discovery and analysis of diverse forms of data. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Awaiting reviewers simply means that they do not have 3 people who have agreed to review the MS. The overall timeframe, 2 weeks from submission to decision, is at the long end of I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. I submitted a paper to some journal. Under review. So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. 1. 査読者への依頼待ち. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 . subject=status report of (paper)? // "I'm concerned about my (date) submission, which was confirmed on (date). It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that Hi, I've submitted my paper to IEEE transaction. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. 2022 Major revision What happened afterwards, mine is also awaiting reviewer selection. " It has not yet changed to "under review" status. 07. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. Dec 11, 2024 · “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”意思是“等待审稿人选择”。这表明编辑已经初步处理了你的稿件，目前正在为你的文章挑选合适的审稿人。这个过程持续的时间因期刊而异。有 Dec 12, 2019 · The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of Nov 30, 2020 · At times, your topic or even your field may be too specialized to easily find a reviewer. Review Settings . The following guidance aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. I have not had any news about it since. This change has occurred Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This change has occurred Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Even otherwise, it may Nov 16, 2015 · A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. We do not Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? science; review-articles; Share. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. The second time I submitted, it has been almost a month, and it is still "Awaiting TE Assignment" I am truly speechless about the staff of this journal. xml Templates EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 28 in review process 2021. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. but it still says "under review". The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. 30 awaiting co-eic recommendation 2021. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. Cite. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. This change has occurred Most quality journals take time to complete the peer review processes. The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. More At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". I have previously published in the same journal Review is Conducted. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation Dec 7, 2018 · I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Due to those unanswered invites, the status says 'awaiting assignment. However, I just noticed that the status of my Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Where do you find a reviewer’s R-Score? The R-Score can be found in the reviewer search results, or by clicking on the spyglass icon next to a reviewer’s name. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Such subjects include: scalable and effective algorithms After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. This change has occurred sosyal bilim akademik dergiler için tasvir etmek gerekirse, kabaca şöyle bir süreç sizi bekliyor. There is no set time for this to take. The status "Awaiting AE assignment" implies that an editor will be assigned to handle the correspondence of your submitted manuscript. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. – What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. 9. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. This change has Jan 8, 2025 · 修改稿提交了近一个月，显示的状态一直是：Awaiting Reviewer Selection 请问一审完了还会再换审稿人吗，另外选择审稿人这么久啊，我是否应该写信催一下编辑？多谢了 Feb 15, 2023 · As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Now it is almost 3 weeks. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 1. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Jan 23, 2023 · Select Reviewers Queue. 1 conditionally accepted with mandatory major change (4 weeks) (Two reviewers, one of whom did not agree to accept the review, should be the reviewer of the I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Statistical Analysis and Review Services Comprehensive statistical support to getting published but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Peer Review in Progress. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. A month is a long time to go with no word. The main statuses Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. 2022 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 18. Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Improve this question. Is it because the AE did not accept the recommendation or my paper has problem? Thank you very much! It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). This change has occurred I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Feb 18, 2022 · It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. " Does this If not, I would contact them immediately just to check up. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one week since the status changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment,’ you may need to wait for some time, let’s say, two-three weeks, for the next status update. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. (date). Follow asked Oct 18, 2023 at Waiting time. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 10. The Action Editor may decide After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. The overall process, from submission to final publication, takes at least half a year or more. awaiting external reviewer scores hakemlere gitti, uzun ve Awaiting Initial Packet Review Awaiting Assignment to Scroll Awaiting X Approval; List ID X##-FY; X days in DoD approval cycle Awaiting selection for publication of orders Scrolls are publishing between 85-100 now, I got it on Day 87, as opposed to day 136 last time I went through. If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. 2. My paper submissions (all to the Astrophysical Journal) have all been followed up by the editor within a week of initial submission. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. If that is the case, then the paper will go under review again and the time taken can be much longer. Can you tell me what sort of time frame to keep in mind as I am awaiting news of my submission? · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. 31 awaiting eic decision 2021. The status changed to "Assigned to AE" 2 days after submission. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. Awaiting Reviewer Scores After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. So, keep up your @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. How does JID Journals use the R-Score? We only rate reviews on quality. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon To summarize the comments: as long as it takes. However, given the speed with which the statuses have changed so far, you could also know soon enough. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Peer review process. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. What can this mean? The platform is I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". You What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean So, there are just fewer people around to do reviews. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. May I ask how long it usually takes to resubmit a If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. The status of the paper changed several times. 23 Status 6: Awaiting AE Make Decision 12. Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. 2023. Do not email to ask about It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 5. What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Ex. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". 6. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. 17. Do not email to ask about Dec 11, 2024 · “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”意思是“等待审稿人选择”。这表明编辑已经初步处理了你的稿件，目前正在为你的文章挑选合适的审稿人。这个过程持续的时间因期刊而异。有的期刊可能在几天内就能选好审稿人，而有的可能需要数周。 Editor here. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer My paper underwent a revision. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Aug 9, 2022 · The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. I got a phone call from admissions letting me know that my app is in final committee review and I should know this by the end of this week or early next week! I applied for their MPP program. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! Editor here. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. I am really Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, whether you want to prepare offline or Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. awaiting editorial office processing (yaklaşık 1-2 hafta) awaiting editor assignment (yaklaşık bir hafta) awaiting external reviewer selection ilk aşamayı geçtiniz tebrikler, yani makaleniz hakeme yollanmaya değer bulundu. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. Lots more papers to review + fewer people to review them = Slow review times. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Reviewer assignments (i. queue for a few days or even over a week. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. At the same time, there's still a big glut of grad students and post-docs who need more publications than ever to get one of the scarce gigs. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. While this may take some time, in your case, it's been nearly 4 months now. ' If the two reviews come in, and are concordant, the editor can decide to make the decision with the two reviews in hand. 6, around 4 PM, awaiting reviewer selection, responsible editor for the journal. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. zdtjk ugcgho afot dqrr puwnzoxu eeyn qnhnm tdrfk asrj quwgbzp

Awaiting reviewer selection for long time. Now it is almost 3 weeks.